<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 888 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122439</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the original order and allowed the appeals by remanding the case for further adjudication. The adjudicator was instructed to conduct de novo proceedings, providing the appellants with an opportunity to present their case effectively within a specified timeframe for resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 888 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122439</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the original order and allowed the appeals by remanding the case for further adjudication. The adjudicator was instructed to conduct de novo proceedings, providing the appellants with an opportunity to present their case effectively within a specified timeframe for resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>