<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 920 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122423</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission found that the applicants were not cooperating and were obstructing the proceedings. Therefore, the Commission decided to send the case back to the proper officer for disposal in accordance with the Customs Act, as if no application under Section 127B had been made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:51:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 920 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122423</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission found that the applicants were not cooperating and were obstructing the proceedings. Therefore, the Commission decided to send the case back to the proper officer for disposal in accordance with the Customs Act, as if no application under Section 127B had been made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>