<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1038 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122418</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is unavailable where specified goods bear the brand name or trade name of another person who is not eligible for the benefit. As the assessee&#039;s goods carried the brand name &quot;Blue Star&quot; belonging to a third party, the Tribunal applied the larger Bench ruling and held that the small-scale industry exemption could not be claimed. The benefit was therefore denied in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1038 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122418</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. is unavailable where specified goods bear the brand name or trade name of another person who is not eligible for the benefit. As the assessee&#039;s goods carried the brand name &quot;Blue Star&quot; belonging to a third party, the Tribunal applied the larger Bench ruling and held that the small-scale industry exemption could not be claimed. The benefit was therefore denied in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>