<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income, confirming the decision of the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer. The penalty was levied based on the main provision of the section, disregarding the arguments raised by the assessee regarding the applicability of certain explanations. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the penalty for concealment of income was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealing income, confirming the decision of the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer. The penalty was levied based on the main provision of the section, disregarding the arguments raised by the assessee regarding the applicability of certain explanations. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the penalty for concealment of income was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>