<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 430 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122415</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order denying Modvat credit to the appellant and remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further verification. The judge clarified that the stock quantity declared by the appellant had attained finality and did not need further examination. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 430 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122415</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the order denying Modvat credit to the appellant and remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further verification. The judge clarified that the stock quantity declared by the appellant had attained finality and did not need further examination. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>