<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 415 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122395</link>
    <description>Interest under section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was held not recoverable because the duty was paid within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the demand. The applicable payment period was computed from the date of the appellate decision, not from the date of the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order. As the assessee discharged the duty within that statutory period, the basis for charging interest did not survive, and no interest liability arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:08:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 415 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122395</link>
      <description>Interest under section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was held not recoverable because the duty was paid within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the demand. The applicable payment period was computed from the date of the appellate decision, not from the date of the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order. As the assessee discharged the duty within that statutory period, the basis for charging interest did not survive, and no interest liability arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>