https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122392 At the interim stage, a notification specifically linked to an identified plant was treated as prima facie applicable despite a marginal capacity difference, because the plant remained not less than 350 MW and the notification contained no prohibition against supply to a plant exceeding that level. The order noted that the excess capacity appeared to arise from technological necessity and did not defeat the notification's object. On that basis, the appellant obtained waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, while the appeal remained pending for final hearing. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:52:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122392 At the interim stage, a notification specifically linked to an identified plant was treated as prima facie applicable despite a marginal capacity difference, because the plant remained not less than 350 MW and the notification contained no prohibition against supply to a plant exceeding that level. The order noted that the excess capacity appeared to arise from technological necessity and did not defeat the notification's object. On that basis, the appellant obtained waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, while the appeal remained pending for final hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122392