<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 408 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122387</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the respondents for a refund of duty paid twice on excisable goods. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) held that the respondents are entitled to a refund of Rs. 1,96,486/- as they did not pass the duty burden to their customers. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that since duty was paid twice on the same goods, the respondents are eligible for a refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 408 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122387</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the respondents for a refund of duty paid twice on excisable goods. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) held that the respondents are entitled to a refund of Rs. 1,96,486/- as they did not pass the duty burden to their customers. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that since duty was paid twice on the same goods, the respondents are eligible for a refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>