https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122375 The Tribunal determined that undisclosed income arising from transactions recorded in the books of account due to client ID mismatches fell within the purview of block assessment. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further review of confirmations submitted before the CIT(A), with a directive to align decisions with accepted confirmations. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled against adding brokerage to prevent double taxation. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122375 The Tribunal determined that undisclosed income arising from transactions recorded in the books of account due to client ID mismatches fell within the purview of block assessment. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further review of confirmations submitted before the CIT(A), with a directive to align decisions with accepted confirmations. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled against adding brokerage to prevent double taxation. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122375