https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122374 The application seeking the recall of the final order was dismissed by the Bench as they found that the non-consideration of the case law cited by the appellants did not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record. The Bench emphasized that the final order reflected their decision on merits and could be appealed through the appropriate appellate channels. They clarified that the remedy against the final order was an appeal to the competent appellate court, not a request for recall. Consequently, the application for recalling the final order was rejected, and the case was concluded with the dismissal of the application. en-us Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122374 The application seeking the recall of the final order was dismissed by the Bench as they found that the non-consideration of the case law cited by the appellants did not amount to an error apparent on the face of the record. The Bench emphasized that the final order reflected their decision on merits and could be appealed through the appropriate appellate channels. They clarified that the remedy against the final order was an appeal to the competent appellate court, not a request for recall. Consequently, the application for recalling the final order was rejected, and the case was concluded with the dismissal of the application. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122374