<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 507 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122372</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand for interest on the differential duty payment. The interest amount was not quantified by the authorities, leading to no recovery of interest until the final disposal of the appeal. There was no requirement for a pre-deposit of the interest amount, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 507 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122372</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the demand for interest on the differential duty payment. The interest amount was not quantified by the authorities, leading to no recovery of interest until the final disposal of the appeal. There was no requirement for a pre-deposit of the interest amount, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>