https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a claim for refund of CV duty paid under protest for Reprocessed LDPE Agglomerates in the Domestic Tariff Area. The High Court of Calcutta rejected the Department's stance on the levy of CV duty, leading to the appellants filing a refund claim. The Supreme Court dismissed the Department's Special Leave Petition. The Tribunal found that the appellants met the requirements for the refund claim, including providing evidence that the extra duty burden was not passed on to buyers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellants were granted the refund claimed. en-us Tue, 29 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning a claim for refund of CV duty paid under protest for Reprocessed LDPE Agglomerates in the Domestic Tariff Area. The High Court of Calcutta rejected the Department's stance on the levy of CV duty, leading to the appellants filing a refund claim. The Supreme Court dismissed the Department's Special Leave Petition. The Tribunal found that the appellants met the requirements for the refund claim, including providing evidence that the extra duty burden was not passed on to buyers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellants were granted the refund claimed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122371