<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 505 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122370</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision rejecting a refund claim under the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized that a certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant should be considered as evidence of non-passing of duty incidence, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s ruling. Referring to past judgments, the Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim unjustified and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 505 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122370</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision rejecting a refund claim under the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized that a certificate issued by a Chartered Accountant should be considered as evidence of non-passing of duty incidence, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s ruling. Referring to past judgments, the Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim unjustified and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>