https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122365 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI, remanded a case involving an excise duty demand for alleged clearance of M.S. Ingots without payment of duty. The appellant's argument that the goods were duty paid under a compound levy scheme and the stock outstanding during the transition to actual production levy should not be considered was accepted. The Tribunal directed verification of records and remitted the case for a fresh determination, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for further review by the original authority. The decision emphasized the importance of verifying facts before deciding on excise duty demands. en-us Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:27:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122365 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI, remanded a case involving an excise duty demand for alleged clearance of M.S. Ingots without payment of duty. The appellant's argument that the goods were duty paid under a compound levy scheme and the stock outstanding during the transition to actual production levy should not be considered was accepted. The Tribunal directed verification of records and remitted the case for a fresh determination, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal for further review by the original authority. The decision emphasized the importance of verifying facts before deciding on excise duty demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122365