<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122336</link>
    <description>Subscription-based dissemination of financial, forex and commodity market information, together with access to devices such as V-SAT and printers, was treated as business income rather than fees for technical services or royalty under the applicable treaty, so the gross-basis restriction in section 44D did not apply. Once classified as business income, brought forward business losses were to be examined for set-off under the ordinary carry-forward rules, subject to verification of availability. Following binding precedent, interest under section 234B was not chargeable in the case of the non-resident taxpayer. The treaty-based characterization thus prevailed over domestic gross-taxation treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 860 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122336</link>
      <description>Subscription-based dissemination of financial, forex and commodity market information, together with access to devices such as V-SAT and printers, was treated as business income rather than fees for technical services or royalty under the applicable treaty, so the gross-basis restriction in section 44D did not apply. Once classified as business income, brought forward business losses were to be examined for set-off under the ordinary carry-forward rules, subject to verification of availability. Following binding precedent, interest under section 234B was not chargeable in the case of the non-resident taxpayer. The treaty-based characterization thus prevailed over domestic gross-taxation treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>