<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 493 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of storage tanks is admissible under the Rules, even though the appellants paid duty on the tanks. The Tribunal considered the exercise as revenue-neutral and did not justify denying credit on inputs used for manufacturing capital goods for further production of dutiable final goods. Consequently, the impugned Order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 493 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of storage tanks is admissible under the Rules, even though the appellants paid duty on the tanks. The Tribunal considered the exercise as revenue-neutral and did not justify denying credit on inputs used for manufacturing capital goods for further production of dutiable final goods. Consequently, the impugned Order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>