<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 488 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122323</link>
    <description>Where an appeal was already fixed for final hearing and the Revenue appeal was directed to be linked, recovery of the disputed amount was held impermissible while the matter remained pending. Applying Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules and its inherent powers, the Tribunal continued the earlier stay order until disposal of the appeal, restraining the Department from pursuing recovery in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 488 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122323</link>
      <description>Where an appeal was already fixed for final hearing and the Revenue appeal was directed to be linked, recovery of the disputed amount was held impermissible while the matter remained pending. Applying Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules and its inherent powers, the Tribunal continued the earlier stay order until disposal of the appeal, restraining the Department from pursuing recovery in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>