<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 536 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122300</link>
    <description>The Court granted condonation of a 75-day delay in filing an appeal due to reasons provided by the appellant, including a change in leadership leading to oversight. Emphasizing the importance of allowing parties to seek remedy promptly, the Court noted the appellant&#039;s good faith in depositing the duty amount and lack of dilatory tactics. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Court decided to condone the delay and allow the appeal to proceed, highlighting the need to consider individual circumstances in condonation cases to ensure parties are not deprived of their right to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 536 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122300</link>
      <description>The Court granted condonation of a 75-day delay in filing an appeal due to reasons provided by the appellant, including a change in leadership leading to oversight. Emphasizing the importance of allowing parties to seek remedy promptly, the Court noted the appellant&#039;s good faith in depositing the duty amount and lack of dilatory tactics. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Court decided to condone the delay and allow the appeal to proceed, highlighting the need to consider individual circumstances in condonation cases to ensure parties are not deprived of their right to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>