<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 527 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122291</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore involved whether dharmada charges should be included in the assessable value for Central Excise duty payment. The Tribunal, after considering previous judgments by the Tribunal and the Apex Court, concluded that dharmada charges are not required to be added in the assessable value. The appeal was allowed based on the consistent rulings that dharmada charges are considered charity and should not be included in the assessable value, despite a conflicting decision by a Two Member Bench of the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 527 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122291</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore involved whether dharmada charges should be included in the assessable value for Central Excise duty payment. The Tribunal, after considering previous judgments by the Tribunal and the Apex Court, concluded that dharmada charges are not required to be added in the assessable value. The appeal was allowed based on the consistent rulings that dharmada charges are considered charity and should not be included in the assessable value, despite a conflicting decision by a Two Member Bench of the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>