<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 523 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122287</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund claim but rejected the interest component, stating the issue had not attained finality. However, the judgment held that when an appeal is allowed by remand, the appellant is entitled to interest on the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The appellant&#039;s claim for interest was allowed, directing authorities to calculate it according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:53:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 523 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122287</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund claim but rejected the interest component, stating the issue had not attained finality. However, the judgment held that when an appeal is allowed by remand, the appellant is entitled to interest on the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The appellant&#039;s claim for interest was allowed, directing authorities to calculate it according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>