<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122284</link>
    <description>An exemption notification directed to end-use in a specified project cannot be denied merely because the project implementing authority&#039;s certificate is issued in the contractor&#039;s name and not the supplier&#039;s name. The goods were cleared for a World Bank-funded project, the project was approved and divided into contracts, and the supplied goods were used for that project. Since the notification required a certificate only to verify duty-free procurement for the covered project and did not expressly insist on a supplier-specific certificate, the substantive condition of project use was satisfied. The exemption was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122284</link>
      <description>An exemption notification directed to end-use in a specified project cannot be denied merely because the project implementing authority&#039;s certificate is issued in the contractor&#039;s name and not the supplier&#039;s name. The goods were cleared for a World Bank-funded project, the project was approved and divided into contracts, and the supplied goods were used for that project. Since the notification required a certificate only to verify duty-free procurement for the covered project and did not expressly insist on a supplier-specific certificate, the substantive condition of project use was satisfied. The exemption was therefore available to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>