<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 580 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122259</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellants in a case involving Modvat credit based on duty paid by the manufacturer of Pig Iron. The judge emphasized that once duty paid by the input manufacturer is utilized as credit, reassessment by Central Excise authorities is not allowed. The appellants were entitled to the credit of duty actually paid by the input manufacturer, amounting to Rs. 42,508. Additionally, a separate undisputed amount of Rs. 509 confirmed by lower authorities was acknowledged by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 580 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122259</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting relief to the appellants in a case involving Modvat credit based on duty paid by the manufacturer of Pig Iron. The judge emphasized that once duty paid by the input manufacturer is utilized as credit, reassessment by Central Excise authorities is not allowed. The appellants were entitled to the credit of duty actually paid by the input manufacturer, amounting to Rs. 42,508. Additionally, a separate undisputed amount of Rs. 509 confirmed by lower authorities was acknowledged by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>