<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 677 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122250</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed both of the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The ITAT upheld that the transactions between the assessee and concessionaires were of principal-to-principal nature, not subject to TDS under sections 194H and 194C. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was challenged but ultimately affirmed by the ITAT, determining that the assessee was not liable for TDS under the mentioned sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 677 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122250</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed both of the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The ITAT upheld that the transactions between the assessee and concessionaires were of principal-to-principal nature, not subject to TDS under sections 194H and 194C. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was challenged but ultimately affirmed by the ITAT, determining that the assessee was not liable for TDS under the mentioned sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>