<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 547 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the alleged offence not grave, requiring immediate suspension as per precedent. Due to the delay in issuing the suspension order, it was deemed non-compliant with the term &quot;immediate action&quot; as per regulations. The appeal was upheld, setting aside the suspension order but allowing the Commissioner to proceed with the enquiry. Appellants were permitted to continue operating under the CHA licence as per the law. Judgment was pronounced on 26-2-2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:59:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 547 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the alleged offence not grave, requiring immediate suspension as per precedent. Due to the delay in issuing the suspension order, it was deemed non-compliant with the term &quot;immediate action&quot; as per regulations. The appeal was upheld, setting aside the suspension order but allowing the Commissioner to proceed with the enquiry. Appellants were permitted to continue operating under the CHA licence as per the law. Judgment was pronounced on 26-2-2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>