<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 536 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Modvat credit for parts of pollution control equipment and material handling equipment, distinguishing them from welding electrodes and calibrate gas. The decision clarified the eligibility of credits based on definitions of capital goods and relevant precedents, ensuring fair treatment for the appellants in claiming credits for essential components in their manufacturing processes. No penalty was imposed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 536 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Modvat credit for parts of pollution control equipment and material handling equipment, distinguishing them from welding electrodes and calibrate gas. The decision clarified the eligibility of credits based on definitions of capital goods and relevant precedents, ensuring fair treatment for the appellants in claiming credits for essential components in their manufacturing processes. No penalty was imposed, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>