<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122217</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paying documents issued before 29-6-1995 remained subject to the six-month limit introduced by the amendment to Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The later deletion of that time limit from 1-4-2000 was treated as a prospective change in law and did not retrospectively revive or save credits already time-barred. The Larger Bench ruling in Kusum Ingots &amp; Alloys Ltd. was followed as directly covering the issue, and the claim for credit beyond six months was held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:49:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 525 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122217</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paying documents issued before 29-6-1995 remained subject to the six-month limit introduced by the amendment to Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The later deletion of that time limit from 1-4-2000 was treated as a prospective change in law and did not retrospectively revive or save credits already time-barred. The Larger Bench ruling in Kusum Ingots &amp; Alloys Ltd. was followed as directly covering the issue, and the claim for credit beyond six months was held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>