<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 523 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122215</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where duty-paid inputs are received and used in manufacture, and a Superintendent&#039;s certificate establishes that receipt. The objection that the certificate was issued under Rule 57E was rejected because the substantive requirement for credit under clause (1) of sub-rule (3) of Rule 57G was satisfied. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 523 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122215</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where duty-paid inputs are received and used in manufacture, and a Superintendent&#039;s certificate establishes that receipt. The objection that the certificate was issued under Rule 57E was rejected because the substantive requirement for credit under clause (1) of sub-rule (3) of Rule 57G was satisfied. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>