<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 447 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s diligent pursuit of remedies before other forums, leading to the condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances and efforts made by the appellant in pursuing remedies before other authorities when deciding on the condonation of delay in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 447 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s diligent pursuit of remedies before other forums, leading to the condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances and efforts made by the appellant in pursuing remedies before other authorities when deciding on the condonation of delay in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>