<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 445 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals against Commissioner (Appeals) orders, citing a change in legal interpretation by the Supreme Court. The delay of 476 and 457 days was not justified solely by the legal shift. Emphasizing the finality of unchallenged orders, the Tribunal held that the appellant failed to provide significant grounds for condonation. The decision underscored the importance of upholding finality and discouraged belated challenges to orders before higher authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 445 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals against Commissioner (Appeals) orders, citing a change in legal interpretation by the Supreme Court. The delay of 476 and 457 days was not justified solely by the legal shift. Emphasizing the finality of unchallenged orders, the Tribunal held that the appellant failed to provide significant grounds for condonation. The decision underscored the importance of upholding finality and discouraged belated challenges to orders before higher authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>