<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122204</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 was partly allowed. The Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was upheld, but the quantum of adjustment for deduction under section 80HHC was modified based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The outcome favored the assessee in terms of jurisdiction but resulted in adjustments to the deduction amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122204</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 was partly allowed. The Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was upheld, but the quantum of adjustment for deduction under section 80HHC was modified based on the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The outcome favored the assessee in terms of jurisdiction but resulted in adjustments to the deduction amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>