<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122202</link>
    <description>Fraudulent availment of Modvat credit without receipt of inputs was treated as established, and the demand and fraud finding had not been challenged further. On remand, no fresh material was produced to justify any different view, so the statutory consequence for such irregular credit applied. Penalty equal to the disallowed credit was therefore upheld as the proper levy in the remand proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:37:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122202</link>
      <description>Fraudulent availment of Modvat credit without receipt of inputs was treated as established, and the demand and fraud finding had not been challenged further. On remand, no fresh material was produced to justify any different view, so the statutory consequence for such irregular credit applied. Penalty equal to the disallowed credit was therefore upheld as the proper levy in the remand proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>