https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122185 The appeal was allowed as the appellant was found not at fault for relying on valid documents provided by the dealer. The responsibility for any irregularity in availing credit on an extra copy of the invoice was placed on the dealer, who should be held accountable under the Central Excise Rules. The order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was successful. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:42:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122185 The appeal was allowed as the appellant was found not at fault for relying on valid documents provided by the dealer. The responsibility for any irregularity in availing credit on an extra copy of the invoice was placed on the dealer, who should be held accountable under the Central Excise Rules. The order denying credit was set aside, and the appeal was successful. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122185