https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122156 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to pass a speaking order regarding the lack of precautions by the appellants in preventing a fire incident. The rejection of the remission application was set aside as the Tribunal found no inadequacy in the precautions taken by the appellants. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, with the remission application granted and the demand in the second appeal deemed unsustainable due to the approval of the remission application. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:32:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122156 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority to pass a speaking order regarding the lack of precautions by the appellants in preventing a fire incident. The rejection of the remission application was set aside as the Tribunal found no inadequacy in the precautions taken by the appellants. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, with the remission application granted and the demand in the second appeal deemed unsustainable due to the approval of the remission application. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122156