<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 522 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122145</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the admissibility of credit for evaporation boats as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal found that evaporation boats, integral to the metallising machine and essential for the metallising process, qualify as capital goods. As they are necessary for the process and withstand high temperatures under vacuum conditions, the Tribunal concluded that evaporation boats are eligible for credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of assessing the role and necessity of components in the manufacturing process for determining their eligibility for credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 522 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122145</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the admissibility of credit for evaporation boats as capital goods under Rule 57Q. The Tribunal found that evaporation boats, integral to the metallising machine and essential for the metallising process, qualify as capital goods. As they are necessary for the process and withstand high temperatures under vacuum conditions, the Tribunal concluded that evaporation boats are eligible for credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of assessing the role and necessity of components in the manufacturing process for determining their eligibility for credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>