<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 516 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the restoration of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of communication and the right of the appellant to be heard. The decision highlighted the need for diligence and proper representation in legal proceedings, especially when involving State Government entities. The judgment underscored the principle of fairness and the requirement to consider all relevant facts before arriving at a decision, as established by legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 516 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the restoration of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of communication and the right of the appellant to be heard. The decision highlighted the need for diligence and proper representation in legal proceedings, especially when involving State Government entities. The judgment underscored the principle of fairness and the requirement to consider all relevant facts before arriving at a decision, as established by legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>