<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 513 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122132</link>
    <description>Admitted clandestine removal of excisable goods without proper invoices and without payment of duty attracted penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Pre-notice payment of duty did not, by itself, wipe out penal liability where the statutory conditions for deterrent action were otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal rejected the view that duty payment after detection could neutralise consequences of deliberate evasion, since that would undermine the object of the penalty provision. The order deleting penalty was set aside and the penalty was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:59:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 513 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122132</link>
      <description>Admitted clandestine removal of excisable goods without proper invoices and without payment of duty attracted penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Pre-notice payment of duty did not, by itself, wipe out penal liability where the statutory conditions for deterrent action were otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal rejected the view that duty payment after detection could neutralise consequences of deliberate evasion, since that would undermine the object of the penalty provision. The order deleting penalty was set aside and the penalty was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>