https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122127 The appeal was allowed partly, modifying the impugned order to reflect the reduction in the redemption fine and setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of the jeep/conveyance was upheld under Section 115(2) due to lack of evidence proving lawful possession of seized goods. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:46:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122127 The appeal was allowed partly, modifying the impugned order to reflect the reduction in the redemption fine and setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The confiscation of the jeep/conveyance was upheld under Section 115(2) due to lack of evidence proving lawful possession of seized goods. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122127