<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 367 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s application to amend the final order, clarifying that proforma credit for duty payment on doubled/multifolded yarns was not applicable as the process did not amount to &quot;manufacture.&quot; The party&#039;s claim of not availing proforma credit was accepted based on a previous Tribunal order. The Tribunal acknowledged the mistake in the original order and amended it to reflect that proforma credit was not available for non-dutiable final products. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the proforma credit claim was allowed only to the extent of clarifying the non-availability of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 367 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s application to amend the final order, clarifying that proforma credit for duty payment on doubled/multifolded yarns was not applicable as the process did not amount to &quot;manufacture.&quot; The party&#039;s claim of not availing proforma credit was accepted based on a previous Tribunal order. The Tribunal acknowledged the mistake in the original order and amended it to reflect that proforma credit was not available for non-dutiable final products. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the proforma credit claim was allowed only to the extent of clarifying the non-availability of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>