https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122089 An earlier remand order was recalled because it rested on an incorrect factual premise that the revenue had not appealed the original order. The Tribunal found that revenue appeals were in fact pending, so the remand had been made on a misstatement of fact by the assessee. On that basis, the Tribunal set aside the prior remand, directed that the matter be listed and disposed of together with the pending revenue appeals, and disposed of the review application accordingly. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122089 An earlier remand order was recalled because it rested on an incorrect factual premise that the revenue had not appealed the original order. The Tribunal found that revenue appeals were in fact pending, so the remand had been made on a misstatement of fact by the assessee. On that basis, the Tribunal set aside the prior remand, directed that the matter be listed and disposed of together with the pending revenue appeals, and disposed of the review application accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122089