<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 510 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122085</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against duty demand and penalty imposition due to the settlement of the dispute under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, rendering the appeal non-maintainable post-settlement. The tribunal emphasized that the issue of clandestine production of excisable goods was part of the settled tax arrears, making the appeal invalid. The tribunal held that the Board&#039;s review order was no longer effective post-settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 510 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122085</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against duty demand and penalty imposition due to the settlement of the dispute under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, rendering the appeal non-maintainable post-settlement. The tribunal emphasized that the issue of clandestine production of excisable goods was part of the settled tax arrears, making the appeal invalid. The tribunal held that the Board&#039;s review order was no longer effective post-settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>