<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 505 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the detention order and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for a fair hearing, submission of the appellant&#039;s case, and a reasoned order in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing an opportunity for a hearing before confirming a demand under Sec. 72 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 505 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the detention order and remanded the case to the Assistant Commissioner for a fair hearing, submission of the appellant&#039;s case, and a reasoned order in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing an opportunity for a hearing before confirming a demand under Sec. 72 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>