https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122047 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, with any necessary consequential relief granted to the appellant. The Tribunal deemed the demands for duty, penalty, and interest improper due to the appellant operating under a bonded warehouse scheme with an extended warehousing license, thus absolving them of duty liabilities. The judgment emphasized compliance with extension procedures and the impact of extended licenses on duty obligations, citing relevant legal principles from previous cases and circulars to support the decision. en-us Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:22:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122047 The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, with any necessary consequential relief granted to the appellant. The Tribunal deemed the demands for duty, penalty, and interest improper due to the appellant operating under a bonded warehouse scheme with an extended warehousing license, thus absolving them of duty liabilities. The judgment emphasized compliance with extension procedures and the impact of extended licenses on duty obligations, citing relevant legal principles from previous cases and circulars to support the decision. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122047