<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 435 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122031</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission found that M/s. Konar Organics Limited was not entitled to full exemption under Notification No. 8/2002 due to availing Modvat credit while paying duty at a normal rate. The applicant&#039;s claimed Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption and Modvat benefit for subsequent years were contested by the Revenue. The Commission clarified the applicability of Notifications No. 8/2002 and 9/2002, determining duty liability based on accounted and unaccounted clearances for specific years. The judgment outlined duty payment terms and entry conditions under Section 32E, emphasizing the Commission&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction over the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 435 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122031</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission found that M/s. Konar Organics Limited was not entitled to full exemption under Notification No. 8/2002 due to availing Modvat credit while paying duty at a normal rate. The applicant&#039;s claimed Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption and Modvat benefit for subsequent years were contested by the Revenue. The Commission clarified the applicability of Notifications No. 8/2002 and 9/2002, determining duty liability based on accounted and unaccounted clearances for specific years. The judgment outlined duty payment terms and entry conditions under Section 32E, emphasizing the Commission&#039;s exclusive jurisdiction over the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>