<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122024</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had to be taken within the prescribed procedural time limit and on valid duty-paying documents. Although the invoice was issued before insertion of the six-month restriction, credit was actually taken much later, after the stipulated period. The delayed availment made the claim unsustainable, and the Modvat credit was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122024</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had to be taken within the prescribed procedural time limit and on valid duty-paying documents. Although the invoice was issued before insertion of the six-month restriction, credit was actually taken much later, after the stipulated period. The delayed availment made the claim unsustainable, and the Modvat credit was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>