<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 613 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122011</link>
    <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for embroidery machines with more than one roller, the relevant meter length was to be computed by reference to only one roller, namely the distance between the first and last needle of that roller. The later amendment to the definition of meter length was treated as clarificatory of the existing position, not as creating a new levy. On that construction, multiple-roller machines could not be assessed by multiplying the measurement through additional rollers or double frames, and differential duty on that basis was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=159002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 613 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122011</link>
      <description>Under the compounded levy scheme for embroidery machines with more than one roller, the relevant meter length was to be computed by reference to only one roller, namely the distance between the first and last needle of that roller. The later amendment to the definition of meter length was treated as clarificatory of the existing position, not as creating a new levy. On that construction, multiple-roller machines could not be assessed by multiplying the measurement through additional rollers or double frames, and differential duty on that basis was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=122011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>