<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 519 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121996</link>
    <description>Capital goods credit under the Modvat scheme was considered admissible where the goods were used exclusively for processing inputs on job work and the finished goods were cleared under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The analysis treats the job-work exemption notification and the Modvat credit provisions as facilitating measures, not restrictions that automatically bar credit. It also regards Notification No. 214/86-C.E. and the earlier view on Notification No. 217/86-C.E. as pari materia for this purpose. On that basis, the denial of credit was found unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to capital goods credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:54:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 519 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121996</link>
      <description>Capital goods credit under the Modvat scheme was considered admissible where the goods were used exclusively for processing inputs on job work and the finished goods were cleared under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The analysis treats the job-work exemption notification and the Modvat credit provisions as facilitating measures, not restrictions that automatically bar credit. It also regards Notification No. 214/86-C.E. and the earlier view on Notification No. 217/86-C.E. as pari materia for this purpose. On that basis, the denial of credit was found unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to capital goods credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>