<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121994</link>
    <description>Credit of countervailing duty paid on fuel oil in vessels brought for breaking was held inadmissible, the point being treated as settled against the assessee by precedent. A bill of entry assessment under the Customs Act could not be reopened or indirectly challenged in proceedings under the Central Excise Act and Rule 57E; any such challenge had to be pursued under the Customs Act itself. The denial of Modvat credit was therefore sustained and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121994</link>
      <description>Credit of countervailing duty paid on fuel oil in vessels brought for breaking was held inadmissible, the point being treated as settled against the assessee by precedent. A bill of entry assessment under the Customs Act could not be reopened or indirectly challenged in proceedings under the Central Excise Act and Rule 57E; any such challenge had to be pursued under the Customs Act itself. The denial of Modvat credit was therefore sustained and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>