<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 738 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121985</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission settled a case involving a Public Ltd. Company that imported goods under an Advance Licence but failed to meet the export obligation, resulting in a duty demand of Rs. 24,05,470/-. The applicant sought settlement, admitting the duty liability and agreeing to pay Rs. 35,01,573/-, which was accepted by the Commission. The Commission affirmed its jurisdiction in cases of default in export obligation under Advance Licence/EPCG Scheme, granting immunities from fine, penalty, and prosecution to the applicants for their cooperation and full disclosure during the proceedings, emphasizing the significance of cooperation and disclosure in seeking such immunities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:16:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 738 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121985</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission settled a case involving a Public Ltd. Company that imported goods under an Advance Licence but failed to meet the export obligation, resulting in a duty demand of Rs. 24,05,470/-. The applicant sought settlement, admitting the duty liability and agreeing to pay Rs. 35,01,573/-, which was accepted by the Commission. The Commission affirmed its jurisdiction in cases of default in export obligation under Advance Licence/EPCG Scheme, granting immunities from fine, penalty, and prosecution to the applicants for their cooperation and full disclosure during the proceedings, emphasizing the significance of cooperation and disclosure in seeking such immunities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>