<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the initiation of the new shipper review as contrary to Rule 22 due to the applicants not meeting necessary preconditions. Consequently, the review proceedings were deemed illegal, leading to the setting aside of the impugned notification and final findings. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the significance of adhering to Rule 22 provisions and ensuring the legitimacy of new shipper reviews.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the initiation of the new shipper review as contrary to Rule 22 due to the applicants not meeting necessary preconditions. Consequently, the review proceedings were deemed illegal, leading to the setting aside of the impugned notification and final findings. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the significance of adhering to Rule 22 provisions and ensuring the legitimacy of new shipper reviews.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>