<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 510 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, limiting the revocation of the CHA license to a specific period. The decision considered the punishment already endured by the CHA and emphasized that the penalty should be proportionate to the offense. The CHA was permitted to recommence work as Customs House Agents after the specified date, aligning with the principle of proportionality in punishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 510 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, limiting the revocation of the CHA license to a specific period. The decision considered the punishment already endured by the CHA and emphasized that the penalty should be proportionate to the offense. The CHA was permitted to recommence work as Customs House Agents after the specified date, aligning with the principle of proportionality in punishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>